DMR or TETRA: A Technical Comparison of Coverage

John Graham, Solutions Marketing Manager at Tait looks past the hype to investigate these two technologies and compare their coverage performance.

DMR vs TETRAEvery year, many communications systems reach the end of their economic life due to obsolescence, regulatory requirements or because they cannot deliver the business benefits of digital radio.

Early in your upgrade process, you need to decide which technology will give you the best coverage without the expense of additional radio sites. Large organizations such as utilities normally purchase trunked radio solutions to provide wide-area dispatch and team-based communications. Ideally, you will be able to reuse your existing radio sites and experience similar coverage from the new investment.

Two digital trunked radio technologies to consider are DMR and TETRA. To decide which provides better coverage, we need an objective approach.

Keeping the Comparison Simple

Many discussions over the last few years have obscured the answer, by imposing other functionality or feature comparisons which do not impact coverage. In essence, factors which impact radio coverage include:

  • The frequency band used, where a lower frequency gives greater coverage. For example, all things being equal, a 150MHz system provides double the coverage of a 400MHz system.
  • Geographic topology or man-made obstacles that screen the radio signals path affect coverage. For the purposes of this article, the aforementioned factors will be held as constant.

The following factors which affect coverage will be discussed in this article:

  • The gap between Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) time slots
  • Delay spread and its effect on modulation
  • The link budget, which influences the radio signal path

TDMA Gap Time

This is a guard period between two consecutive time slots. A radio at distance from a base station transmitting, followed immediately by a second radio close to the base station transmitting on the following time slot can cause a collision of the two messages. The distant signal is likely to fail as it is weaker.

This is caused by the extra time (at the speed of light) it takes the signal from the distant radio to arrive at the base station. The message from the distant radio may still be arriving when the near radio starts to transmit. This is described as the Near/Far effect.

In practice, if this situation occurs, the DMR range is around 75kms and TETRA around 30kms. This is due to the gap time being longer in DMR. This is unlikely to be a limiting factor in an urban environment but in a flat rural setting, it could be significant.

Delay Spread

Delay spread is caused by the same signal arriving at the receiver via two (or more) different paths. One signal may be direct, the other reflected/bent around objects in its path, so each arrives at a different time but at similar amplitude. The speed or complexity of the modulation scheme (how data is applied to the radio signal), determines how susceptible it is to delay spread.

Delay spread is measured in microseconds (µS) – a higher value is more tolerant to spreading. DMR has a delay spread tolerance of 28µS compared with 15µS for TETRA. Again, this is unlikely to be a factor in urban areas, or in open rural situations, as typical delay spread is around 5µS. While it can affect rural environments with rugged landscapes, escarpments and canyons with no direct radio path, it is only likely to occur near the edges of the coverage area.

Link Budgets

Link budgets determine the maximum possible signal loss that can be tolerated between a transmitter and a receiver before communications fail. If we calculate the link budget for a base station transmitter (high site) to a radio terminal receiver (downlink) as well as the radio signal path between the radio terminal (portable) and the base station receiver (uplink) we get differences in performance. This table shows the parameters that determine radio capability, comparing DMR and TETRA. The larger the negative value in the radio terminal sensitivity, the better. A 4.3dB advantage for DMR (conservative value) equates to around a 1.5 times increase in the radius, or over twice the coverage area for DMR compared with TETRA in the downlink. Whereas the 6.8dB uplink advantage of DMR over TETRA equates to over twice the range and a coverage area increase of nearly three times.

Technology DMR TETRA DMR TETRA
Path Downlink (base station) Uplink (portable)
Power output 44.0dBm ERP 44.0dBm ERP 36.0dBm ERP 31.8dBm ERP
Equivalent noise bandwidth 8kHz 18kHz 8kHz 18kHz
Dynamic Co-channel SINR for DAQ 3.4 15dB 16dB 15dB 16dB
Radio terminal receiver noise figure 8dB 8dB 8dB 8dB
Radio terminal receiver sensitivity (including diversity) -112dBm -107.7dBm -112dBm -109.4dBm
Difference 4.3dB 6.8dB

So which provides better coverage – DMR or TETRA? From this information we can clearly see in the case of both TDMA gap time and link budget, DMR offers a measurable improvement in coverage or range. While the advantage may be limited in a busy urban environment, when coverage includes rural areas, DMR demonstrates significant coverage advantages over TETRA.

The author acknowledges the information provided by Principal Engineer Ian Graham in the preparation of this article.


Tait Connection - Issue 4This article is taken from Connection Magazine, Edition 4. Connection is a collection of educational and thought-leading articles focusing on critical communications, wireless and radio technology.

Share your views, comments and suggestions in the Tait Connection Magazine LinkedIn group.

To learn more, download our free whitepaper, Comparing Voice Coverage: DMR and TETRA.megan-cta-images-white-papers

To get updates as our posts get published, subscribe via email below:

Email Address


Tait Communications

 | Posts

Our clients protect communities, power cities, move citizens, harness resources and save lives all over the world. We work with them to create and support the critical communication solutions they depend on to do their jobs.

Comments

  1. Terry says:

    Great explanation John thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *